Alianger(Friday 28th of November 2008 12:18:33 AM)
not too shabby I guess. Really reminds me of my bloody valentine/early primal scream though.
spentfromnz(Sunday 2nd of November 2008 01:34:14 AM)
How is it that this sounds more dated than The Beatle's original?
Slammerworm1(Thursday 6th of November 2008 12:07:51 PM)
Warner Brothers signed her and threw a bunch of money at her. This 1990 single was supposed to spearhead the big breakthrough which would put her 'Blast The Human Flower' album into the charts and establish DD in the US. No such luck. The result was too toned-down for her old fans and too idiosyncratic to attract new ones. The album mix of this is better (nice Edie Sedgewick vocal sample), but this cover is altogether just too bland. The late-80s production techniques date it terribly.
cbsection8(Wednesday 29th of October 2008 11:36:34 AM)
This is a stinker of a cover. I suppose she was fighting a losing battle from the start covering one of the best tracks ever made but still this is banal rubbish.
Every once in a while, a cover comes along that makes the original sound like a BAD half-baked cover.
And this is at top of the list. ;) I love every second. So much richer with more texture than the original.
NouveauDance(Thursday 30th of October 2008 03:16:04 PM)
Well, I won't bad-mouth an original, especially a Beatles one, you'll never hear the end of it - but yes, this is a great cover. :)
Danielle was definatley ahead of her time, I bet a lot 'bigger' acts stole from her - ever listened to 'Muzzles' and then Kate Bush's 'Rubberband Girl' back-to-back? Tell me that isn't lifted?!!
I just listened to Rubberband Girl and its great. I've heard a few other of Kate Bush's more famous songs but never that one. Thanks.
Lyktwz(Wednesday 15th of October 2008 11:21:20 AM)
Wow, I like it!
chibivine(Thursday 11th of September 2008 06:47:27 PM)
Haha, I like her commentary in the beginning. Truth. But not as much as I like this songgg.
lagarticus(Friday 29th of August 2008 08:06:56 PM)
If the Beatles had a synth it probably would have sounded a bit more like Sheila Chandra's version of this song(How I wish there was a video to post on here...) which is much less vacuous than this one...