Bias is a term used to describe a tendency or preference towards a particular perspective, ideology or result, especially when the tendency interferes with the ability to be impartial, unprejudiced, or objective. This is exactly what we see among the liberals today. And they are not shy about attempting to brand all who disagree with them as facists, racists, and other lables designed to move the focus from them to their slandered victims.
"there isn't any good news coming out Iraq"
No, there's actually tons. It's uproariously ironic that your comments are (unbeknownst to you) a primary result of the media bias they discredit. Tired as the argument may be, it continues to ring true.
tons of good news?? good news for who? the corporations making huge profits? or the families of the dead & injured solders?
All the innocent people getting killed?
Lets see your "tons" of good news.
This reporter is in Iraq, where are you?
StanDellone(Saturday 28th of June 2008 02:52:06 AM)
Her logic is flawed. She says that she cannot report on the good things going on such as school reconstruction because she cannot be at the ground breaking ceremony or on the scene personally. Yet at the same time, she's not there when every road-side bomb goes off or a soldier dies, and she's perfectly able to put pen to paper and report on it. If she's aware of the reconstruction projects, then she has a journalistic duty to report them accordingly, from first-hand experience or not.
resistance022(Wednesday 25th of June 2008 12:29:41 PM)
WOW, she's a danger to the establishment. Intelligent, ambitious and a maverick. We need more like her. Imagine how the American news media would be if it was owned, operated and staffed by people who think and see things the way that she does. Ms. Lara Logan is one of a very few U.S. news journalists that I respect and gain my full attention when ever I hear her voice.
interesting, im doing a report on media bias on iraq this is a good viewpoint...thanx for uploading
barbcinque(Thursday 20th of March 2008 08:21:47 PM)
I dont see much difference with cnn. If Hillary had allowed Ferraro to go unpunished for her brief comments, she would have been hung out to dry. However, Obama continues to embrace someone who publicly espouses to and preaches some pretty deep felt horrible beliefs that are one step short of what alqaeda is saying about the us. Yet, he is applauded for another great speach only this time he turns this into a race issue. What the &^%$?
barbcinque(Thursday 20th of March 2008 08:21:11 PM)
I dont see much difference with cnn. If Hillary had allowed Ferraro to go unpunished for her brief comments, she would have been hung out to dry. However, Obama continues to embrace someone who publicly espouses to and preaches some pretty deep felt horrible beliefs that are one step short of what alqaeda is saying about the us. Yet, he is applauded for another great speach only this time he turns this into a race issue. What the &^%$?
