Nu-nu - ala nu e mers... A scos un tip cu Logan de serviciu. Nu e genul care merge incet si nici nu forteaza - e foarte... eficient. La drum, "valseaza" cu masina si face depasirile si tot mersul super-cursiv - ai zice ca a lucrat pe camionu' cu nitroglicerina ;-)
Iti pot spune de mine cu un Cielo cu care faceam Buc-BV cu min. 15l . I l-am dat astuia la intors si am reumplut in Baneasa putin sub 10 litri desi nu ne mocaisem deloc pe drum...
Crede-ma SOFERUL CONTEAZA enorm la consum !
GilBelgium just one question for you: pls, name an actual _BRITTIS_ car brand ?
Besides, name a similar _GERMAN_ car as DACIA LOGAN MCV (space, engine, 7 seats, optionals etc...) which you can buy for a similar budget.
_ITALIAN_ cars are great - if you mean Ferrari, Lamborghini but those are at least 10X more expensive than Logan...
SO?!... What were you saying is right only if we forget about the money and -FYI- Logan's intended customers cannot afford to forget about money issue ;-)
cu chin si amar pe autostrada extraurban daca mergi cu 50 km/h in a 4-a obtii consumul acela... 1.4 la 5.5 nu prea am vazut... poate cu chin.. mare chin.. dar in general... lasand partea cu fortatul.. sau condusu economic.. consuma 6.8 - 7 dar sincer... care sofer nu are nervi in bucuresti in traficul acesta... sa fim seriosi logica e una... practica alta :)
Xlay16 - 2 comentarii:
1. Logan 1,4 poate consuma 5,5 daca:
-pui benzina foarte buna
-este intretinut si in stare OK (15-60K)
-stii sa conduci si economic (nu e totul sa nu fortezi)
-nu esti ahtiat dupa drenalina
2. DACIA LOGAN nu a fost conceputa sa aiba "nerv" sportiv ci sa fie o masinuta ieftina, eficienta - o solutie decenta de transport auto personal. De aceea, orice utilizare in afara a ceea ce a fost prevazut duce la aberatii (consum, uzura & defectiuni premature) si e si periculos
RancheroBFT - would you still be supporting the thirsty US cars if Oil went up over 200$?
IMHO, the US have a BIG problem regrading their car building philosophy: big, heavy, big engine disregarding fuel consumption, polution etc... This is also easy to see with what's happening with the USA branches of Ford, GM etc...
German cars are not at all comparable to the US ones - 30 years ahead! As for brittish... pls, tell me: which are the actual british brands (none anymore)?
Very hard to believe that... Essential components are more than 80% the same and provided by Renault themselves. Even the main design is Renault.
In my opinion, if you evaluate quality (and/or longevity) per money spent, Renault cars suck big time related to all japs & corean ones. LOGAN is at least a cheap one so, IMHO in terms of what you get per each Euro you spend or in the similar category, Renault sucks, not Logan
ForThePoets(Monday 24th of November 2008 12:39:04 PM)
Well, not the most fortunate name for a car. See why : " Logan cowboy strikes. " You'll see what Logan is really like.
cata18tm(Saturday 22nd of November 2008 02:08:24 PM)
logans are very good if you pay for the extra otions...
cata18tm(Saturday 22nd of November 2008 01:58:38 PM)
dude your clip is awesome. i luv things like that(playing with the car in the dirt) ;)
cata18tm(Saturday 22nd of November 2008 01:53:21 PM)
Logan seems very well with Laguna and other renaults, but logans are expensive and do NOT have even half of the performances of renault.renault are very safe cars and they really don't suck.
