Learn your rights - Read the entire Fair Credit Reporting Act by clicking on the image above.



TU-95 (NATO reporting name:Bear)

Back



The Tupolev Tu-95 (NATO reporting name Bear) is the most successful Tupolev strategic bomber and missile carrier from the times of the Soviet Union, still in service as of 2006 and expected to remain in service with the Russian Air Force until at least 2010 [1]. The Bear is powered by four Kuznetsov turboprop engines, each driving contra-rotating propellers, and remains one of the fastest propeller-driven aircraft ever built. To date it remains the only turboprop-powered bomber to have been deployed. A naval version is designated Tu-142.For a long time, the Tu-95 was known to Western intelligence as the Tu-20. While this was, in fact, the original Soviet Air Force designation for the aircraft, by the time it was being supplied to operational units, it was already better known under the Tu-95 designation used internally by Tupolev and the Tu-20 designation fell out of use. Since the Tu-20 designation was used on many documents acquired by Western intelligence agents, the name continued in use there. Like its American counterpart, the B-52 Stratofortress, the Tu-95 has continued to operate in the Russian Air Force while several iterations of bomber design have come and gone. Part of the reason for this longevity was its suitability, like the B-52, for modification to different missions. Whereas the Tu-95 was originally intended to drop nuclear weapons, it was subsequently modified to perform a wide range of roles, such as the deployment of cruise missiles, maritime patrol (Tu-142 Bear-F), AWACS platform (Tu-126) and even civilian airliner (Tu-114). During and after the Cold War, the Tu-95's utility as a weapons platform has only been eclipsed by its usefulness as a diplomatic icon. When a patrolling Tu-95 appears off the coast of the United States or one of its allies, it may not be the technological menace that it was in its heyday, but it is still a potent and visible symbol of the Russian capability to project military power over great distances. The Soviet Union did not assign official "popular names" to its aircraft, although unofficial nicknames were common. Unusually, Soviet pilots found the Tu-95/Tu-142's NATO reporting name, 'Bear,' to be a fitting nickname, given the aircraft's large size, 'lumbering' maneuverability and speed, and large arsenal. It is often called Bear in Russian service. An anecdotal story states that it was actually a Russian crew who had the privilege of assigning the NATO reporting name; during the aircraft's Paris Airshow debut, a Western reporter asked the crew what the plane's name was. The pilot responded, "it can't be anything but a bear."

Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: November 12, 2006 at 12:37 pm
Author: zeoul001

Length: 0:07:47
Rating: 4.78
Views: 137,965

Tags: TU-95 tu 95 strategic bomber aircraft plane airplane pro russian tupolev boeing airbus 747 787 A380 war nuclear bomb jet

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
coldshot357 (Monday 18th of August 2008 10:54:55 PM)
the idea behind keeping the B52 is first it drops lots of bombs for a relativly low cost. also if they go to war with another big power your so busy dealing with the ones that are esy to see it's easier for stealth aircraft to get in and hit vital targets. So not arguing your point xylaph just adding to it
Mikelaren101 (Monday 18th of August 2008 09:28:28 PM)
Why do you ask they still use it? Cause it still works!
jaspreet112233 (Monday 18th of August 2008 12:52:55 PM)
i am from india, it is always going to be my favrite plane, col war legend
Azkrav47 (Friday 15th of August 2008 11:17:55 PM)
I like the russian design for their planes
ketsan (Wednesday 13th of August 2008 03:46:57 PM)
I was there at the time. Most of us were a bit bemused, we deserve at least a tu-160, but I suppose you've not got the balls to fly one of those too close to one of our shiney new Typhoons.
nadegda (Friday 22nd of August 2008 09:17:14 AM)
"Shiney new Typhoons" didn't try to engage it, did they? When they do, then we would talk. Bears are not as simple to shot down as they look.
ketsan (Friday 22nd of August 2008 09:21:13 AM)
The only thing stopping it being blown out of the sky is it's ECM, once that's burned through.................
ketsan (Friday 22nd of August 2008 09:24:28 AM)
Or just track it on the IRST and pop it with a sidewinder or asraam.
nadegda (Friday 22nd of August 2008 10:35:31 AM)
Well, then sidewinder or asraam would have to go through whole lot of fantom targets, wouldn't it and on the way avoid twin 23-mm guns shooting at pretty good rate. Don't forget those pesky Suhoys or MiGs somewhere around on real missions. Anyway, thank G_d, nobody had to try any of the defensive-offensive tacticts of trying to shot down Bears in real life. Hope we would never have to witness it and find out what would happen.
ketsan (Friday 22nd of August 2008 11:17:38 AM)
Exactly. A single bear on it's own isn't much of a threat. To have a serious chance of surviving it's mission it needs to be backed up by ECM and fighters. At least a backfire or blackjack can run.

 

Please visit our sponsor below.
  Visit CreditReporting.com for your 3 Bureau report

Home  |  Free Credit Repair Articles  |  Credit Repair Resources  |  Contact Us  |  Fair Credit Reporting Act

Free Credit Repair Copyright © 2008 All Rights Reserved.